Popular Jointblog media trend keywords: viral video | Stephen Colbert | Google | Yahoo | Apple | cellphone | Facebook | TV | Radio | podcast | YouTube | Market Research | Ideas | Branding | Social Media | Teens
« Home | Net Neutrality In Danger? Concerns About Media an... » | The Original Electronic Media » | Attention autograph seekers: Google and Gawker par... » | What's The Frequency, Radio? There's new rules fo... » | MySpace spin offs an emerging trend » | Viral Video On Google: Dancing Stormtrooper » | Contagious viral videos are powering the latest Bu... » | A modern version of having the "finger on the butt... » | This Time It's Personal: Howard Stern's Latest App... » | Productive Digital Agenting: Media Keeping Alumni ... »
THE OLD STEREOTYPE THAT MEN are hunters and women are gatherers is actually an apt profile of online shopping behavior today. Online, men like to "dig," choosing a site and drilling down within it to hunt for information. Women, on the other hand, like to "scan" -- they are multitaskers who move through massive amounts of data quickly. These and other differences were uncovered in a recent report, "Gender on the Net: Why It Matters, Where It's Missing, How It Should Work," produced by interactive agency Resource Interactive and comScore Networks. The study tracked 326,000 online purchases over the course of a year, generated 250 hours of one-on-one engagement with 50 men and women, and incorporated custom data from 150,000 online households and a survey of 1,000 online participants.
The study found that men prefer sites chock full of product pictures and specs, while women prefer to see the product in a lifestyle context. "Women prefer flatness," says Nita Rollins, executive director of marketing at Resource Interactive. "They don't want to be tripped up by undue amounts of product detail, whereas men prefer the detail."
full OMMA online media, marketing and advertising article here
Scientific American article on the differences between men and women here
posted by Unknown @ Monday, March 20, 2006,

0 Comments:
<< Home